![]() |
Back to Frogs Forum Forums Home Members Area
Frogs Forum
Namcap Gretchenellie Namcap Zeek Butcher JackAsp Mr.Pacman Namcap JackAsp Jo3Madness JackAsp Jo3Madness JackAsp |
| Member | Message | ||
|
Namcap View Profile |
Pacman Tank.
Link <-- Bigger View The Layers in the middle are little river rocks, covered by fine mesh so my frogs don’t ingest any, if that’s an issue. And the water is hooked to a filter beneath the log, so the water will stay clean, and the plants are real, and suck up a lot from the dirt, so i end replacing about a cup of spring water every other day. It is misted once in the morning, and once when i get home from school. The light is on from 8:00 in the morning, to 9:00 at night, sometimes a little later. The light is a 50 Watt hooks to a regular desk light, so it gets warm, not hot. There is also a fluorescent light for the plants but I took it down for the detail shots. If you see anything wrong with ,y set up, please tell me so i can fix it, and no more of my pets will die. Even though i only had Dart (Deceased Albino) for a week or so, he is dearly missed. Thanks, Namcap |
||
| 04/19/08 07:56pm |
|
||
|
Gretchenellie View Profile |
Message To: Namcap In reference to Message Id: 1709400 Pacman Tank.
you are housing them together in pairs...... WHY???? they are cannible’s (sp?) . if given the chance, they will eat another one of their own kind ( along with anything else). i am also concerned that you are using moss, which, if ingested even in small amount can be deadly. they are lunger’s when it comes to food, and wont hesitate to swallow moss, pebbles or other substrate items.. are you hand feeding them? you can house them together, if you place a divider in between. and the setup would need to be at least 20 gallons for two. |
||
| 04/19/08 08:59pm |
|
||
|
Namcap View Profile |
Message To: Gretchenellie In reference to Message Id: 1709485 Pacman Tank.
Also i have read up, and sphagnum moss, that is finally shredded is perfectly digestible, mine is finally shredded, natural, and untreated, also, i do NOT feed them in there tank, they are fed in separate containers, alone, no other frog. So moss ingestion is not an issue with them, the worst one of them has eaten is a pebble, and my finger. No i do not hand feed my frogs. I count out the crickets, dust them, and put them in with the frog, in it individual keeper. If they do not eat all the crickets i dust a single super worm and set it in, remove the left over cricket after a duration of about 20 min. They also receive a guppy/feeder fish once a week. And an adult frog can be kept in a ten gallon, this is a 5-8 inch frog in a tank a little less than two feet. They don’t move enough to need ten gallons a frog, when they are an inch across. To ease the issue, once they get around 3-4 inches. they are being moved to a 65 Gallon long, with a divider. If they are all difference sizes they will be split up. If two match up, they will be kept in a pair. |
||
| 04/19/08 09:15pm |
|
||
|
Zeek Butcher View Profile |
Message To: Namcap In reference to Message Id: 1709510 Pacman Tank.
|
||
| 04/20/08 07:58am |
|
||
|
JackAsp View Profile |
Message To: Zeek Butcher In reference to Message Id: 1709844 Pacman Tank.
|
||
| 04/20/08 10:52pm |
|
||
|
Mr.Pacman View Profile |
Message To: JackAsp In reference to Message Id: 1710795 Pacman Tank.
|
||
| 04/21/08 02:39pm |
|
||
|
Namcap View Profile |
Message To: Mr.Pacman In reference to Message Id: 1711291 Pacman Tank.
|
||
| 04/21/08 10:58pm |
|
||
|
JackAsp View Profile |
Message To: Namcap In reference to Message Id: 1711937 Pacman Tank.
You’re going to wait until after they get mean ( while playig technicality games about heir fangs) before you seperate them? What’s the plan then? Put the injured one through a time machine? How’d that work for the one you thought pebbles were a harmless idea for? This has nothing to do with "natural." In nature they kill each other. This is you admitting there’s risk, but wanting to see how long you can get away with it. Name one advantage the frogs get from you accepting the increased danger. You can’t even monitor how long a frog’s gone without defecating if there’s two in the same tank. Nor can you do individual parasite checks; if one tests positive, you’ll have no idea which one. Yay! Free medicinal side effects for everybody! Everyone has listed at least one potential con. You have yet to list a single pro except "maybe I’ll get away with it for a while." |
||
| 04/22/08 08:07am |
|
||
|
Jo3Madness View Profile |
Message To: JackAsp In reference to Message Id: 1712150 Pacman Tank.
|
||
| 05/01/08 11:24pm |
|
||
|
JackAsp View Profile |
Message To: Jo3Madness In reference to Message Id: 1722840 Pacman Tank.
Just so you know, frogs do not want to assist each other in tearing apart food. That’s them all fighting over the same item, and each settling for part of it because it’s all they can get. Belive me, if you feed them each without another frog trying to get it they will not be upset. Some species of crocodiles hunt in packs, but frogs are a completely different type of animal. I’ll ask again: besides fighting over food, which they’re both happier and safer without having to do, what "advantage" for the frogs compensates for the risk? The owner gets a better display with no risk of harm to himself. The owner gets bragging rights without any risk of harm to himself. I understand that. What do the frogs get? |
||
| 05/02/08 04:59pm |
|
||
|
Jo3Madness View Profile |
Message To: JackAsp In reference to Message Id: 1723384 Pacman Tank.
|
||
| 05/02/08 06:55pm |
|
||
|
JackAsp View Profile |
Message To: Jo3Madness In reference to Message Id: 1723505 Pacman Tank.
2. If there’s extra food in the cage, and there are two frogs in the cage, then you’re feeding them together. That’s the main way accidents happen. If they don’t often want a little more, then you’re overfeeding them. If they’re kept singly, you don’ have to do that. 3. Congratulations on having bragging rights to having had only one frog fight. That’s fewer than.. well, people who have even more, I guess. Most owners are able to avoid them entirely, though, unlike you. Since frog skin is considerably more sensitive than human skin, and I’ve bled from horned frog bites, I’d say group housing carries a risk of harm, but I guess as long as it didn’t actually kill one and force you to go out and spend another $19.99 everything’s good,huh? I love that even after you’ve seen that it can happen you still get mad when someone says they might bite each other. There is also no shortage whatsoever of photographic evidence of them maiming, killing, or even choking on each other. 4. You observe for a week or month? Most people would have to sleep or go to work way before then. What do you do, leave a note that days "don’t bite each other" or just hope you stay lucky? 5. If it’s not risky, you wouldn’t feel such a need to insist you take measures to prevent trouble. So don’t get all bent out of shape when other people want to know why you’re endorsing a risky technique when there is a much easier, safer option. If one does bite another on, you can’t even make it not have happened. All you can do is stop it from getting worse. The frog that got chomped is still feeling it, unless you have access to a time machine. 6. How do you even monitor individual health? If I ever have an animal that’s constipated or has a strange-looking stool I know which one it is. What’s your system? 7.What advantage do the frogs gain from this? A firebelly or clawed frog or Roccoco owner would have hit me with a better anecdote about social interaction than fighting over food by now. If they get something positive out if it, then maybe the pros balance out the cons. If they couldn’t care less, then why put them at risk? I’m not sure why I’m even asking this question again. If you were going to answer it, you probably would already. 8.Minimizing a risk, without gaining an advantage, is not the same thing as gaining an advantage. It not only has no inherent advantage over not having the risk in the first place, but it has the disadvantage of being unnecessarily complicated, and therefore More prone to error. It sounds to me like you’re suggesting people simply take a longer route to reduce the same problems that everybody else takes a short route to eliminating entirely. If I were talking about all the hoops I have to jump through to keep my solitary frog from feeling lonely, and you were saying "Well, I just keep mine together and they play leapfrog all day" then the advantage would be yours unless I counteracted by explaining why I was afraid to keep them together in the first place. "Filtered cigarette logic," basically. The best way way to avoid lung cancer is to not smoke, all the rest is just damage control. (I know, there’s also coal mining and whatnot, but it’s a loose analogy.) 9. You’re hardly the only person who’s kept them for a nine years. Hell, I even had a Cranwell’s longer than that, and unlike ornates they usually only live about seven. They do get better about not biting the wrong thing over the years, but they’re never one hundred per cent trustworthy if they’re hungry. a. They’re not very smart, and b. They don’t really care if they hurt someone. They just want food. 10. There are a few anurans that may display positive social interaction besides breeding. Firebellies, clawed frogs, and cane toads are often credited with it. I don’t know how much of that is actually true and how much is misinterpretations of territorial behavior or simply both liking the same cage areas at the same times of day, but I’m open to the idea. With horned frogs... expect a bit more skepticism. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. |
||
| 05/04/08 01:27pm |
|