Venomous Snakes Forum
Click Here To Register and Become A Member Of The RepticZone Family
Back to Venomous Snakes Forum Forums Home Members Area
| Pages 1 2 3 Next |
| Member | Message | ||
|
WT NolaN View Profile |
Venom glands removed
|
||
| 09/26/08 01:03am |
|
||
|
Philodryas View Profile |
Message To: WT NolaN In reference to Message Id: 1868506
Yes, as simple as that! |
||
| 09/26/08 01:31am |
|
||
|
Amphibiandude View Profile |
Message To: Philodryas In reference to Message Id: 1868513 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 09/27/08 11:29am |
|
||
|
Rebelyell83 View Profile |
Message To: Amphibiandude In reference to Message Id: 1869254 Venom glands removed
Quote: removeng the glands i painfull and can kill the snake most of the time and then the snake is usually going to die young and ie slowly and painfully
not true but anyway,IF the surgery is done properly,then i think its ok,but i would ONLY ever recomend if somebody buy one then go through venomoid inc,notrd vet,to much to go wrong |
||
| 09/28/08 03:47am |
|
||
|
Philodryas View Profile |
Message To: Rebelyell83 In reference to Message Id: 1869786
Why....WHY.....would it be okay to lobotomate a animals that is perfectly healthy? Why can’t people either take the time to learn how to handle hots or get a non-venomous snake? Is it becouse you want to look cool on pictures with you’r friends freehandling a cobra, gaboon or what ever?? |
||
| 09/29/08 03:26am |
|
||
|
Occ1123 View Profile |
Message To: Philodryas In reference to Message Id: 1870487 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 09/29/08 04:07pm |
|
||
|
Phoenixatrox View Profile |
Message To: Philodryas In reference to Message Id: 1868513 Venomoid’s
I don’t understand why everyone despises this surgical procedure, if its done by a licensed professional than whats the problem. Do we not cut off are pet dogs. horses, ect... balls to neuter them! Or how about declawing are cats because the owners don’t like there cats clawing the couch. Or even surgically removing a ferrets cent glands so it won’t smell. Why are all these surgical procedures O.K. and not venomoid’s, is that not hypocritical. There is no scientific proof that venomoids need there venom to digest there food or getting the procedure shortens there life span so don’t give me that reason unless you can prove it. I don’t want to start a argument just a respectful debate.
|
||
| 11/03/08 09:49pm |
|
||
|
Rebelyell83 View Profile |
Message To: Philodryas In reference to Message Id: 1870487 Venom glands removed
Quote: Why....WHY.....would it be okay to lobotomate a animals that is perfectly healthy?
why is it ok for humans to dock ears and tails on dogs?,it has no purpose for the life of the animal,does it make them healthier? heres a couple reasons why it would be acceptable: what if someone is doing educational demonstartions with snakes,but due to state regulations,cant take a hot to a school or such,where the education of identifying a hot,could be a great thng for the kids to get,so they dont get bit by a water moccassin thinking tis a rat snake?,well.a venomoid would fit the bill perfectly,dont YOU think? what about the person who goes through thier 1000 hours of training with hots,gets thier permits,has the caging set up to state safety specs,but due to living circumstances,cant get a full on hot?,should they be denied the pleasure of owning that species?,in some states to own a venomous and a venomoid,the regs are the exact same,so its not like you can walking the street with a cobra in your pocket or anything just some food for thought |
||
| 11/04/08 10:25pm |
|
||
|
Indigo rattlers View Profile |
Message To: WT NolaN In reference to Message Id: 1868506
|
||
| 02/03/09 08:41pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: Indigo rattlers In reference to Message Id: 1946247 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/04/09 03:24pm |
|
||
|
Tenten~ View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1946707 Venom glands removed
~Adeline~ |
||
| 02/05/09 12:11pm |
|
||
|
Rebelyell83 View Profile |
Message To: Tenten~ In reference to Message Id: 1947375 Venom glands removed
in most instances,i do agree with you on your last comment,i think there are way to many people buying backwoods done venomoids,so they can own a cobra,but there are people who also just love the species,that get them to safely handle it,once i get my venomous permit,i wont get any venomoids either,more or less pointless,if i have to go through the same stuff to get either one,i might as well just get the real deal,can get 3 times as many venomous for the same price,lol but i do think,for people in thier first few hours of venomous training,a venomoid would be helpful there,,although i used the real deal for my training begining,and will be using it all the way through,i advocate them for training useage,which,in terms,really makes me a hyprocrite,as i perosnally wont buy one or train with one |
||
| 02/05/09 05:01pm |
|
||
|
Snakeobsession View Profile |
Message To: Rebelyell83 In reference to Message Id: 1947580 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/07/09 01:50pm |
|
||
|
Rebelyell83 View Profile |
Message To: Snakeobsession In reference to Message Id: 1948719 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/08/09 08:55am |
|
||
|
JEFF QUARLES View Profile |
Message To: Rebelyell83 In reference to Message Id: 1869786 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/08/09 12:15pm |
|
||
|
SoLA View Profile |
Message To: JEFF QUARLES In reference to Message Id: 1949197 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/08/09 12:34pm |
|
||
|
Shiftylarry View Profile |
Message To: SoLA In reference to Message Id: 1949209 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/08/09 12:41pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: Shiftylarry In reference to Message Id: 1949216 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/09/09 10:37am |
|
||
|
Wild "J" View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1949770
|
||
| 02/09/09 12:58pm |
|
||
|
JEFF QUARLES View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1949770 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/09/09 03:06pm |
|
||
|
Rebelyell83 View Profile |
Message To: JEFF QUARLES In reference to Message Id: 1949926 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 02/10/09 01:51pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: Rebelyell83 In reference to Message Id: 1950430 Venom glands removed
https://ritdml.rit.edu/dspace/handle/1850/2503 http://www.jstor.org/pss/1446536 http://www.sicb.org/meetings/2009/schedule/abstractdetails.php3?id=1155 http://comp.uark.edu/~mmccue/PDFs/venomAbs.pdf http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=1651279&pageindex=1 (this article is from 1906) Venom is also useful for locating prey after a strike (inconclusive as to the need for venom for digestion): http://www.bio.davidson.edu/people/midorcas/animalphysiology/websites/2008/Eskew/PreyEffects.htm May assist in digesting prey at low temperatures (see Bryan Stuart): http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/agcomm/magazine/winter02/zero.htm Meter-dosing in snakes: http://www.llu.edu/llu/faculty/whayes/documents/1995_hayes_et_al._copeia_np_rattlesnakes_meter_venom.pdf More interesting stuff: http://www.biochemj.org/bj/377/0215/bj3770215.htm from the above: The acidic PLA2s in the viper venoms have, in general, evolved more isoforms than the basic PLA2s [12,13]. Whether the hydrolytic activities of acidic venom PLA2s contribute to the digestion of preys [35] is not clear, and have been shown to be inhibitors of platelet aggregation. The presence of multiple isoforms of T. stejnegeri acidic PLA2s is probably an adaptation to diverse preys with different platelet properties [13]. As to longevity, I think you would be hard pressed to prove that the surgery yields an animal with a shortened lifespan. What we encounter is a lack of objective data, and a wealth of anecdotal information. Anecdotes do not prove general principles as they are isolated, non-reproducible events. The brutal truth is that many captive animals do not live long lives. Many animals in the wild also live short lives, so that is a wash. I do not think that I have a bias one way or the other as to the ethics of possessing or producing venomoids. I don’t own any, I would not encourage the purchase of such animals as an alternative to proper and safe handling, I do not consider EVERY person who would purchase such an animal to be an idiot, I certainly have reservations about the process (it should be performed with anesthesia and analgesia, if it is to be performed at all), etc. We all suffer from cognitive errors in which we believe what we wish to be true and look for confirmation of these beliefs. I am rather comfortable with a bit of doubt and uncertainty, I find that there is a dearth of absolutes and a surfeit of ideas and beliefs which should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism. |
||
| 02/10/09 10:35pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1950733 Venom glands removed
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009 Apr;152(4):579- 85 Prey envenomation does not improve digestive performance in Taiwanese pit vipers (Trimeresurus gracilis and T. stejnegeri stejnegeri). Chu CW, Tsai TS, Tsai IH, Lin YS, Tu MC. Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. It has been a common belief that snake venom may help in the digestion of its prey, although direct examples and supporting evidence have not been sufficient. To address this, the present study examined whether preinjecting natural amounts of pit viper venom into experimental mice may accelerate their digestion by the snakes or gain energy benefit as compared to the control without the envenomation. Live adults of two Asian pit viper species Trimeresurus gracilis and T. stejnegeri stejnegeri, which inhabit the cold and warm environment respectively, were the subjects studied herein. A natural dose of 1.2 mg of each of the pit viper venom in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was injected into the mouse (about 10% of the snake mass) before it was being fed to the same species of vipers, while the pit vipers in control group were given mouse injected with sterile PBS. The snakes were kept at 14 degrees C or 24 degrees C, and parameters of gut passage time, costs of digestion, and/or digestive efficiency were measured. The results did not support the hypotheses that envenomation facilitates prey digestion. The venom in fact caused longer first defecation time and lower assimilation energy at 14 degrees C. Besides, the time to reach the oxygen consumption peak, and the first defecation time of T. s. stejnegeri were longer than that of T. gracilis. Titre du document / Document title Prey envenomation does not improve digestive performance in western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox) Auteur(s) / Author(s) MCCUE Marshall D. ; Résumé / Abstract Although the toxic properties of snake venoms have been recognized throughout history, very little is known about the adaptive significance of these powerful mixtures. This study examined the popular hypothesis that prey envenomation enhances digestion by influencing the energetic costs of digestion and assimilation, gut passage time, and apparent assimilation efficiency (ASSIM) in western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox), a species whose venom is recognized for its comparatively high proteolytic activities. A complete randomized block design allowed repeated measures of specific dynamic action and gut passage time to be measured in eight snakes ingesting four feeding treatments (i.e., artificially envenomated live mice, artificially envenomated prekilled mice, saline injected live mice, and saline injected prekilled mice). A second experiment measured ASSIM in eight snakes ingesting a series of six artificially envenomated or six saline injected mice meals over an 8-week period. Contrary to expectations, the results of both these experiments revealed that envenomation had no significant influence on any of the measured digestive performance variables. Gut passage time averaged 6 days and ASSIM averaged 79.1%. Twenty-one hours following ingestion, postprandial metabolic rates exhibited factorial increases that averaged 3.9-fold greater than resting metabolic rate. Specific dynamic action lasted on average 88 hr and accounted for 26% of the total ingested energy. The results of this study reinforce the need to systematically examine the potential adaptive advantages that venoms confer on the snakes that produce them. Revue / Journal Title Journal of experimental zoology. Part A. Ecological genetics and physiology ISSN 1932-5223 Source / Source 2007, vol. 307, no10, pp. 568-577 [10 page(s) (article)] |
||
| 03/06/09 07:11am |
|
||
|
Audio View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1963941 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 03/06/09 04:09pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: Audio In reference to Message Id: 1964147 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 03/07/09 10:08am |
|
||
|
JEFF QUARLES View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1964497 Venom glands removed
|
||
| 03/07/09 10:38am |
|
||
|
SoLA View Profile |
Message To: JEFF QUARLES In reference to Message Id: 1964505 Venom glands removed
While a constant temperature is a good control in itself with an extotherm, and it shows its own line of "proof," we need to also examine that the snake would naturally seek different temperatures within a range if provided...and these studies do not examine this at all. Now if we are using this to justify the practice of venomoid snakes in captivity, we then have the proof in the results given their set temperature zones, and we are certainly on track of proving something useful to us. Nice post. But for the topic in general, I am all about control here (as you can tell from my post I hope), and we can control situations in education where venomous snakes are used safely. We should be pushing this route to insurance companies because any surgery is undoubtedly some detriment to the animal. |
||
| 03/08/09 08:01pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: SoLA In reference to Message Id: 1965179 Venom glands removed
It has yet to be demonstrated that venomoid surgery (properly performed) is detrimental to the animal’s health. That would require further investigation. When dealing with living things, control is not always guaranteed. We cannot control every circumstance, behavior, response, event, etc. We can utilize engineering and behavioral (our behavior) controls, however we will never gain control over every factor in every circumstance. We have a name for unplanned events - accidents. |
||
| 03/08/09 09:52pm |
|
||
|
SoLA View Profile |
Message To: Flherp In reference to Message Id: 1965241 Venom glands removed
A venomoid surgery would be an unnecessary short cut. Safe handling practices minimize adversives. My comment on behavior was also to point out that there are effects to the snake that are not being questioned and studied. While I would agree it would likely be minimal, it isn’t measured. |
||
| 03/08/09 10:08pm |
|
||
|
Flherp View Profile |
Message To: SoLA In reference to Message Id: 1965248 Venom glands removed
I would consider a symptomatic bite to a keeper to be an adverse outcome. I would also caution keepers to develop safety procedures and then adhere to them. However, I would not fault an individual who chose to keep venomoids to provide an additional margin of error. This does not mean that I condone free-handling or other such behaviors, merely that I can see this procedure used in circumstances other than those of showing off. |
||
| 03/09/09 07:09am |
|
| Pages 1 2 3 Next |